Re: lug-bg: ATA Promise RAID nevoli.
- Subject: Re: lug-bg: ATA Promise RAID nevoli.
- From: teodor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Teodor Georgiev)
- Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 13:41:12 +0200
----- Original Message -----
From: "Anton Tinchev" <atl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <lug-bg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 1:47 PM
Subject: Re: lug-bg: ATA Promise RAID nevoli.
> Ot koi sa gi zimali neshtata?
kazah - grycka e firmata.
> I kva e podrobnata knfiguracia.
Intelsko server shasi SR1300, Intel server board SE7500WV2.
> Teodor Georgiev wrote:
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Anton Tinchev" <atl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <lug-bg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 12:06 PM
> > Subject: Re: lug-bg: ATA Promise RAID nevoli.
> >
> Pone nali si slozil baracuda ata IV ili ata V diskove?
Seagate Barracuda ATA IV. Ha.. tykmo izvadih edinia disk i Linuxa zabi s
"FastTrack: Drive interrupt Time Out.(3)".
Da im pikam i na hotswapa, i na RAID-a, i na draiverite.
> Chak predi 3 dena slozih edna eepro da testvam, a nekav server sales
manager (moze bi ot sashtata firma)
> mi obiasnavashe sohte predi 6 meseca, che intel imali driveri za
eepro1000, i to ot dosta vreme i to stabilni
dosta vreme? :)
15 May 2002 mi sochat draiverite za EE 1000, deto Intel gi dadoha.
Mdaaa.. svetyt bi bil dosta po-napred ako gi nqmashe sales managerite.
> >
> >
> >>3. Kato se kara izvan BG (Amsterdam...) znachi tozi server e dosta vazen
i
> >
> > spokoino mogat da mu se slozat scsi discove.
> >
> > to ne e BG, ama anyways. A i e izbrano IDE po drugi prichini (nqkoi hora
ot
> > ekipa ne obichat SCSI).
> To ne e do obich, ami do performance. Dade, niakoi gledat raw transfera na
ide-tata
> che daze e po goliam ot scsi v niakoi sluckai, ama neraboteshta ot
pretvarvane mashinka
> (static content apache - po tochno mp3-bg-com, pravi po 7-8 TB na mesec),
padna na 15%
> samo s edin adaptec aha-2940u2w i edin scsi cheetah
ami fakt e che IDE-tata sa po-byrzi.
> Iskash sorsovete na driverite za celia hardware, deto sa ti probutali, ili
go crashtash.
> Na balgarskata firma. Ili ne go vrashtash, a pravish niakoia smiana samo.
firmata ne e bylgarska. A grycka. Po prostata prichina che firmata (tazi v
koqto rabotq) e v Kipyr.
No gyrcite sa po-golemi lainari i ot bylgarite. A otnosno IT sa pylna skryb.
> >
> >
> >
> >>5. Ako chetesh do tuka - probvai 2.4.19-ac5 - v nego ima pone pravilno
> >
> Red hat ne e za serveri. Mnogo e tezka i slozna. Mai nai dobra e slack.
> tia pone e priznata ot vsicki za tezki serveri
tova pyk koi ti go kaza? A i az ne slagam Redhat ei taka, a e silno
customiziran (otkym izbor na paketi).
Az sym rabotil mnogo sys slackware i si priznavam che Redhat e po-dobro
poradi kup neshta:
1. kickstart configuriraneto, 2. paketite (RPM - widely supported), 3.
up2date (ima i apt-get za Redhat) i kup drugi neshta.
Administrianeto e po-lesno.
A i Redhat e nai-komersialnia Linux. Vseki poddyrzha Redhat - Oracle kazvat
"Iskash Oracle pod Linux - REDHAT".
I t.n.
Ne iskam da otvarqm flame war na tazi iztyrkana tema. I spiram.
============================================================================
A mail-list of Linux Users Group - Bulgaria (bulgarian linuxers).
http://www.linux-bulgaria.org - Hosted by Internet Group Ltd. - Stara Zagora
To unsubscribe: http://www.linux-bulgaria.org/public/mail_list.html
============================================================================
|